5 #####
1 New York City http://www.nyc.gov/portal/site/nycgov/?front_door=true 5
6 Philadelphia http://www.phila.gov/ 5
12 San Francisco http://www.sfgov.org/ 5
26 Nashville http://www.nashville.gov/ 5
31 Oklahoma City http://www.okc.gov/ 5 low
35 Fresno http://www.fresno.gov/default.htm 5
37 Long Beach http://www.longbeach.gov/default.asp 5
41 Cleveland http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/CityofCleveland/Home 5
42 Virginia Beach http://www.vbgov.com/ 5
43 Miami http://www.ci.miami.fl.us/cms/ 5
50 Arlington http://www.arlingtontx.gov/ 5
from MY search on google
http://www.co.yavapai.az.us/content.aspx?id=17148
Glendale AZ
http://www.glendaleaz.com/Court/
Scottsdale AZ
http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/courts/
Tempe AZ
http://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/courts/
Tucson AZ
http://www.tucsonaz.gov/courts/index.html
Shawnee KS
http://www.cityofshawnee.org/Court/court.html
Akron OH
http://courts.ci.akron.oh.us/
Barberton OH
http://www.cityofbarberton.com/clerkofcourts/doc_home.html
Canton OH
http://www.cantoncourt.org/
Dayton OH
http://www.daytonwejis.com/index.html
Marietta Municipal Court
Madison, Wisconsin
http://spiritofcitywebs.com/node/54
http://www.ci.madison.wi.us/
This site looks like it going though a lot of changes when you look at some pages the site navigation has drop down and other pages the same menu item is not a drop down.
Fort Collins, Colorado http://spiritofcitywebs.com/node/53 http://www.ci.fort-collins.co.us/ this has a good professional feel to the site. I had to hunt around for the mayor it took four or five clicks to find it. Yet I was able to find the broilerplate information really easier.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
just got done doing a site review on Lakewood, Colorado http://spiritofcitywebs.com/node/50 This is a cold fusion site oh my lord someone is still using cold fusion this violates the keep it simple and common stupid. Being tied to cold fusion is like being tied to cobalt.
I completed a quick site review of Chesapeake, Va for my bigger design study. (at http://spiritofcitywebs.com/node/40 ) I am still trying to make up my mind what I think of the page. I did think that the code was well written and up to date with technology. But I am still out on use-ability and layout. It got a lot of good stuff going on but I am still in the information collect mode.
Hummm not a lot of project planning stuff today but it was a busy day over all.
I have to think about how to provide guidance about how to write a Content page. Which seems to be harder then I would have thought original. So that is difficult piece that I need to provide in the near future.
Set up several meetings including one to talk about a model page that I want to use. And they want study material before the meeting. I need to be able to get out the ideas about Graceful Degradation, Accessibility, Semantic Code Use, and Web Standard Code Separation.
I started working on RichmondGov.Com back in April and over the last six months I am starting to think that I am getting the full scope of what the website is covering. it sounds like i am stupid when I say that but I am coming into an already huge website. and dealing with e-government application, code re-use issue, and to be true more than a little over design.